研究

ScolioTrack 背后的科学依据

ScolioTrack 测量躯干旋转角度（ATR）——这与临床医生使用手持式脊柱侧弯测量仪（scoliometer）筛查和监测脊柱侧弯的方法相同。以下是支持这一方法的同行评审证据的通俗摘要，随后附上完整的参考文献列表。

ScolioTrack 是什么： 一款基于经临床验证的 scoliometer / ATR 方法的筛查与居家监测辅助工具。它有助于您与医疗专业人员沟通，并在两次就诊之间进行追踪。它不能诊断脊柱侧弯，不能从 X 光片测量 Cobb 角，也不能替代专业医疗评估或在临床需要时进行的 X 光检查。

1. 智能手机 scoliometer 应用能准确测量躯干旋转

手机内置传感器测量躯干旋转角度的可靠性，可与诊所使用的实体 scoliometer 相当。
Balg F, et al. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34(8):774–9. Level I validation.

一款智能手机 scoliometer 应用与实体 scoliometer 的测量结果误差在 0.4° 以内（ICC 0.947）；即使不使用适配器也可用于临床评估。 DOI

Driscoll M, et al. Scoliosis. 2014;9:10.

患儿家长也能获得可靠的 ATR 读数（ICC 0.91），接近脊柱外科医生使用 scoliometer 的水平——支持居家监测。 DOI

Navarro IJRL, et al. (ISICO, Milan). Sensors (Basel). 2026;26(7):2099.

在 Adams 前屈试验中，基于应用的 ATR 测量与 scoliometer 高度相关，偏差极小。 DOI

2. scoliometer / ATR 方法是成熟的筛查工具

数十年的研究验证了 scoliometer 用于脊柱侧弯筛查以及长期追踪躯干旋转的价值。
Amendt LE, et al. Phys Ther. 1990;70(2):108–17.

确立了 scoliometer 作为筛查工具的高可重复性（r = 0.86–0.97）——同时指出，单凭读数不足以作出诊断。 DOI

Coelho DM, et al. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013;17(2):179–84.

与 X 光 Cobb 角有良好相关性（r = 0.7），在 5° 阈值下灵敏度达 87%；并指出患者在随访期间可能接受约 25 次 X 光检查。 DOI

3. 家长和患者可以在家监测

经验证的居家筛查让家庭能在两次就诊之间追踪变化，更早发现进展。
Yılmaz HG, et al. Asian Spine J. 2023;17(4):656–65.

一项由家长执行的远程筛查测试涵盖 865 名儿童，准确率 94.97%、灵敏度 83.51%、特异度 98.87%。 DOI

Bottino L, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(8):5520.

一篇评估 ScolioTrack 的同行评审应用综述认为，应用类工具可减少到诊次数，并支持远程进展追踪。 DOI

4. 为什么减少不必要的 X 光很重要

儿童对电离辐射更为敏感；尽量减少可避免的 X 光检查是公认的临床目标。
Ilharreborde B, et al. Eur Spine J. 2015;25(2):526–31.

文章指出，常规 X 光与儿童终生癌症风险增加 1–2% 相关，支持 ALARA 原则以及在必要检查之间采用无辐射监测。 DOI

5. 诚实说明局限性

我们列出这一点，是因为临床医生更信任承认自身边界的证据。

Nadler EB, et al. (SickKids, Toronto). Bone Jt Open. 2026;7(4):473–81.

一款智能手机表面形貌应用在估计弯曲度方面与 X 光仅为中等至较低的一致性，尚不能替代 X 光和面对面评估——但作为筛查辅助工具显示出明确潜力。居家应用是临床照护的补充，而非替代。 DOI

Li H, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:e50631.

一款 AI 应用自动测量 Cobb 角，与 PACS 参考值误差约 2°——值得关注的相邻技术。 DOI

References and Research Papers

  1. Adobor RD, Riise RB, Sorensen R, Kibsgard TJ, Steen H, Brox JI (2012) Scoliosis detection, patient characteristics, referral patterns and treatment in the absence of a screening program in Norway. Scoliosis 7(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-7-18
    Article,  PubMed,  PubMed Central,  Google Scholar.
  2. Ali Fazal M, Edgar M (2006) Detection of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta OrthopBelg 72(2):184–186 PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, Dobbs MB (2013) Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med 369(16):1512–1521 CAS,  Article Google Scholar
  4. Negrini S, Minozzi S, Bettany-Saltikov J, Chockalingam N, Grivas TB, Kotwicki T, Maruyama T, Romano M, Zaina F (2015) Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006850.pub3
    Article,  PubMed,  Google Scholar
  5. Agabegi SS, Kazemi N, Sturm PF, Mehlman CT (2015) Natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in skeletally mature patients: a critical review. J Am AcadOrthop Surg 23(12):714–723 Article,  Google Scholar
  6. Negrini S, Donzelli S, Aulisa AG, Czaprowski D, Schreiber S, de Mauroy JC, Diers H, Grivas TB, Knott P, Kotwicki T, Lebel A, Marti C, Maruyama T, O’Brien J, Price N, Parent E, Rigo M, Romano M, Stikeleather L, Wynne J, Zaina F (2018) 2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 13:3 Article,  Google Scholar
  7. Andermann A, Blancquaert I, Beauchamp S, Dery V (2008) Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bull World Health Organ 86(4):317–319 Article,  Google Scholar 
  8. Labelle H, Richards SB, De Kleuver M, Grivas TB, Luk KD, Wong HK, Thometz J, Beausejour M, Turgeon I, Fong DY (2013) Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an information statement by the scoliosis research society international task force. Scoliosis 8:17 Article,  Google Scholar
  9. Bunnell WP (1984) An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(9):1381–1387 CAS,  Article,   Google Scholar 
  10. Bunge EM, Juttmann RE, van Biezen FC, Creemers H, Hazebroek-Kampschreur AA, Luttmer BC, Wiegersma PA, de Koning HJ (2008) Netherlands Evaluation Study on Screening for Scoliosis G Estimating the effectiveness of screening for scoliosis: a case-control study. Pediatrics 121(1):9–14 Article,  Google Scholar
  11. Deurloo JA, Verkerk PH (2015) To screen or not to screen for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A review of the literature. Public Health 129(9):1267–1272 CAS,  Article,  Google Scholar
  12. Qiao J, Xu L, Zhu Z, Zhu F, Liu Z, Qian B, Qiu Y (2014) Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools. BMC MusculoskeletDisord 15:343 Article,  Google Scholar
  13. Naziri Q, Detolla J, Hayes W, Burekhovich S, Merola A, Akamnanu C, Paulino CB (2018) A systematic review of all smart phone applications specifically aimed for use as a scoliosis screening tool. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 28(1):25–30 Article,  Google Scholar
  14. Franko OI, Bray C, Newton PO (2012) Validation of a scoliometer smartphone app to assess scoliosis. J PediatrOrthop 32(8):e72–e75 Article, Google Scholar 
  15. Prowse A, Pope R, Gerdhem P, Abbott A (2016) Reliability and validity of inexpensive and easily administered anthropometric clinical evaluation methods of postural asymmetry measurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 25(2):450–466 Article,  Google Scholar
  16. Balg F, Juteau M, Theoret C, Svotelis A, Grenier G (2014) Validity and reliability of the iPhone to measure rib hump in scoliosis. J PediatrOrthop 34(8):774–779 Article,  Google Scholar
  17. Driscoll M, Fortier-Tougas C, Labelle H, Parent S, Mac-Thiong JM (2014) Evaluation of an apparatus to be combined with a smartphone for the early detection of spinal deformities. Scoliosis 9:10 Article,  Google Scholar
  18. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2010) The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 19(4):539–549 Article,  Google Scholar 
  19. De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL (2011) Measurement in medicine practical guides to biostatustucs and epidemiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Book,  Google Scholar
  20. Izatt MT, Bateman GR, Adam CJ (2012) Evaluation of the iPhone with an acrylic sleeve versus the Scoliometer for rib hump measurement in scoliosis. Scoliosis 7(1):14 Article,  Google Scholar
  21. Sapkas G, Papagelopoulos PJ, Kateros K, Koundis GL, Boscainos PJ, Koukou UI, Katonis P (2003) Prediction of Cobb angle in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. Clin OrthopRelat Res 411:32–39 Article,  Google Scholar
  22. Amendt LE, Ause-Ellias KL, Eybers JL, Wadsworth CT, Nielsen DH, Weinstein SL (1990) Validity and reliability testing of the Scoliometer. Phys Ther 70(2):108–117 CAS,  Article, Google Scholar
  23. Pearsall DJ, Reid JG, Hedden DM (1992) Comparison of three noninvasive methods for measuring scoliosis. Phys Ther 72(9):648–657 CAS,  Article,  Google Scholar
  24. Coelho DM, Bonagamba GH, Oliveira AS (2013) Scoliometer measurements of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Braz J Phys Ther 17(2):179–184. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552012005000081, Article,  PubMed,  Google Scholar 
  25. Bunnell WP (1993) Outcome of spinal screening. Spine 18(12):1572–1580 CAS,  Article,  Google Scholar
  26. Navarro IJRL, Jacob L, Masetto K, et al. (2026) Validation and reproducibility of an app for continuous measurement as an assessment tool for idiopathic scoliosis. Sensors (Basel) 26(7):2099. DOI
  27. Yılmaz HG, Büyükaslan A, Kuşvuran A, et al. (2023) A new clinical tool for scoliosis risk analysis: Scoliosis Tele-Screening Test. Asian Spine J 17(4):656–665. DOI
  28. Nadler EB, Lebel DE, Kim DJ, Camp M, Dermott JA (2026) 3D topographic acquisitions to predict spinal curvature in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective validation study. Bone Jt Open 7(4):473–481. DOI
  29. Li H, Qian C, Yan W, et al. (2024) Use of artificial intelligence in Cobb angle measurement for scoliosis: retrospective reliability and accuracy study of a mobile app. J Med Internet Res 26:e50631. DOI
  30. Bottino L, Settino M, Promenzio L, Cannataro M (2023) Scoliosis management through apps and software tools. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20(8):5520. DOI
  31. Ilharreborde B, Ferrero E, Alison M, Mazda K (2015) EOS microdose protocol for the radiological follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 25(2):526–531. DOI